Cool Mac Gear


iTunes_RGB_9mm

Does Apple Hate Dialup Users?

5397
Yesterday, I had occasion to visit The Apple Store Site for a "quick" fact check. I put "quick" in quotes, because as regular readers know, I'm out in the boonies of Nova Scotia where broadband is unavailable, and stuck with a rural dialup connection that gives me 26,400 bps throughput on good days.

Apple's Website has always been slow on dialup, but since the site redesign a couple of months ago it's been absolutely abominable. "Speed" is relative in this context, but even with my poky connection, a lot of sites load with reasonable dispatch. Not Apple's, and yesterday afternoon was something of a nadir.

Three browsers in succession, including Safari, locked up, with the spinning beachball and "not responding" showing in the Force Quit dialog. They might have eventually sorted themselves out had I waited, but I have little patience for such things, and killed them. I did eventually get on the site (with SeaMonkey) and found what I was looking for, but the whole exercise took more than 20 minutes.

It's hard not to infer that if Apple doesn't have it in for us dialup users, at least they have cast us adrift. Macs - even portable models - no longer come with internal modems. You have to cough an extra $50 bucks (Can$60.00 here in Canada, which is another rip with the Canabuck having hovered around the US$ . 95 mark for about a fiscal quarter now) for a clumsy USB modem dongle in order to use newer Macs on dialup. The slow-as-molasses-running-uphill-in-January Website load is just another backhand.

I'm not an intentional Internet Luddite. I was the first to sign up the day dialup service arrive here back in '97, and would order broadband service in a heartbeat if it was available here, but it isn't and won't be until at least late 2009, if current projections hold. Yes, you can get satellite Internet, but the cheapest deal I costed out worked out to a bottom line of more than $3,000 over a two year contract, locked in with a punishing penalty for early cancellation. Plus I would still need dialup service for weather-related satellite outages. I just can't afford or justify it.

And according to the Nova Scotia government, a lot of us in this province are in the same boat - 22 per cent of Nova Scotians don’t have access to broadband. That’s 200,000 people or 93,500 households, and 5,600 businesses. OK, we're a small province, with a total population under 1 million, but broadband Internet is a virtual necessity these days if you're in business.

However, Website designers might spare a bit of compassion for those of us who still live on the disadvantaged side of the digital divide for a little while longer. It's not an inconsequential market. US broadband penetration broke 80% in February 2007, with dialup users connecting at 56Kbps or less now comprising 19.84% of active Internet users in the US, but that's still an awful whack of users.

CM



Charles W. Moore

Posting Comments Requires Membership

Login   or   Register    

Charles,

The answer to your question is: YES.
Now, get over it.
Move to an urban area with broadband.
Rural areas will ALWAYS be discriminated against. Servicing them flat out costs more per dollar of revenue.

,dave

Supposedly, the savior for rural areas will be
WiMAX or BPL (broadband over power lines).

The fact is that no designer can nor will design sites to load for dail up. Fact one; the numbers od dail up user are small and getting smaller everyday. Two site have so many advance capabities that a dial up can not handle. My suggestion is that you pressure your service providers and or government to upgrade.

It’s not true that “no” designer will design sites for dial up. I work for a large “not to be named” retailer and we do track dial-up connections and do make an effort to ensure that our online site is “dial-up” friendly.
I think the problem of broadband access for rural areas needs to be addressed on a national, regulatory bases. Unfortunately it is left to the “market.” If that had been the case with electrical and phone service in the last century, rural areas would still be in the dark with no phone service.

Apple’s site design is beautiful to view over a fast connection, and I imagine it must be horrific over dial up. As a work around, you can query apple.com via the search engine of your choice and just visit the pages you need. You can also view pages cached by search engine as text only.

Ideally, bandwidth busting sites, like apple.com, should provide a minimalist version (this can be done by the designer with a stylesheet.) Unfortunately, most cool tools, like DevonAgent (which pull in pages you query for local storage and later reading), require high bandwidth to do their page scraping. The internet is becoming increasingly hostile to the modem using crowd.

Another possibility, if you can hook into a wi-fi hotspot or other hi-speed connection nearby, is to do your day’s surfing at another locale and queue up pages for reading at home. After all, portability is one of the prime justifications for a laptop! Besides, you probably need to get out more.

Lastly, send Apple feedback at http://www.apple.com/contact/feedback.html with a link to this article. You are not the only one suffering this burden.

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


Most Popular

iPod




iPhone

iLife

Reviews

Software Updates

Games

Hot Topics