August
20, 2001
What could go wrong with a
little thing like that?
Oh
good, the techie has arrived!
I'm not any such thing, of course, but
that's the role that's been thrust upon me in the
course of an extended stay with my mother here in
Tucson, Arizona. My siblings will not be surprised
to hear that I have been asked to do everything
from fixing a drawerful of dead flashlights to
repairing a broken hydrator shelf in the
refrigerator. The former required replacing
batteries, the latter explaining why it just could
not be done -- a bad move, given that my family
never met a half-- um, a du--, er, a cheap
solution it didn't like (whew). Be that as it may,
something much more critical turned up the other
night.
After being the good son and installing Norton
Systemworks plus TechTool Lite on the old lady's
original Rev. A iMac, I noticed that the iMac's
mouse would freeze every time the computer started
up. I didn't think the utilities and the mouse
failures were related, but you never know. The
problem had shown up before, though not often. Now,
however, the mouse was useless. Sometimes it never
did move, sometimes it would work for 30 seconds
and then freeze. Most aggravating. In one
evening of troubleshooting, I never used a
straightened paper clip so much. Finally it
occurred to me to try the Apple Pro mouse we had
brought along with the iBook: SHAZAM!!! It worked
perfectly, of course. Geez.
Before this obvious diagnostic procedure
occurred to me, I had thought that perhaps the
hockey-puck was all jammed up with dirt and crud,
so I took a look. My nearly 80-year-old mother
likes her computer for email and some Web surfing,
but she isn't what you'd call a heavy user: the
inside of that mouse was nearly pristine!
Anyway, I guess we need a new one.
Razing
Arizona
We now begin a parable, as it were,
during the reading of which you are gently urged to
think of Microsoft's latest scorched-earth
"innovation." By that I mean the fact that those
cagey codeslingers in Redmond have decided that the
new Internet Explorer browser for Windows shall not
support QuickTime and a whole host of other
plug-ins, thus compelling Apple to crank out a
bastard version that works with Hacker Heaven,
otherwise known as ActiveX. I may have some of the
details wrong, but you get the drift. This is more
of the "Our way or the highway!" treatment
only the newborn or psychiatrically hospitalized
don't expect from Microsoft these days. What this
means for future Macintosh versions of this "take
it you moron, it's free" software, only those of
average intelligence and above can tell.
OK. First we have Exhibit A, below, a lovely
slice of Sonoran desert. You will note that it is
not the least bit empty or in need of attention.
Everything is in harmony and works fine, as God
intended. By the way, those saguaros are usually no
more than 3 inches tall even after ten
years, so those big ones are truly ancient.
This landscape is in reality even more beautiful
in person, having an astonishing variety of plant
and animal life. It can also be quite mystical and
psychedelic, especially in the evening when the
thick cholla spines are backlit by the setting sun
and give off an eerie glow. Many of the bushes and
cacti send roots down 40, 50, 60 feet or more. You
want permanent, we got permanent. Unfortunately,
more and more people want to live in Tucson, for
reasons obviously not related to the stifling heat.
These people need places to live. The desert being
what it is, though (rough, spiny, uneven, and hard
to get to), the easiest way to build houses for
desert-lovers is to get rid of it, i.e. scrape it
clean, level it, and dump in a cluster of
homes.
Exhibit B shows one such result. Probably two
dozen new houses will be crammed cheek-to-jowl on
the terraced lots inside this naked patch, and most
of them will be sold before they are finished. I
realize that many will argue that this clustering
is a better way to build houses in such places,
rather than defacing the landscape with more roads
leading to individual homes scattered hither and
yon. Perhaps this is true. Perhaps it is better to
pick a certain area and obliterate it completely
rather than carve intrusive roads throughout the
region. There are in any event already
plenty of roads, only now they are lined with
clear-cut walled cluster developments instead of
individual houses sited in the surrounding
landscape. It just offends me, that's all, as I
prefer variety.
Memory
refreshment and replacing the
irreplaceable
For those of you lucky enough to have
grown up without the constant threat of nuclear
annihilation, the neutron bomb is a Cold War
concept that for all I know was actually produced
and may yet be in the arsenal. The basic idea was
to produce a nuclear blast high overhead that was
short on destructive power but long on radiation.
The resulting bombardment of neutrons would
instantly kill every living thing within a certain
radius but leave infrastructure, weaponry, and
other useable resources intact. This was thought to
be highly useful for, say, dealing with Soviet
troops in Eastern Europe, since collateral damage
would be limited only to hundreds of thousands of
nearby residents. The quiet houses, factories,
railroads, tanks, and water closets could then be
used by anyone who was left, after what would have
been the Mother of All Cleanup Jobs. I leave it to
you to imagine how such weaponry would be employed
today in places like the Balkans if small,
shoulder-launched versions were available, and I
humbly suggest that one of Bill Gates' fondest
dreams is to code a software version of the same
thing. From what I read, Microsoft is getting
pretty close!
But to continue the Tale of the
Desert:...
Exhibit B, above, is very close in general
appearance to the way a huge swath of desert will
soon look like very near the location shown in
Exhbit A. A large golf course, resort, and
condominium complex has been approved for an area
adjacent to Tucson Mountain Park, very close to
where my mother lives. God knows how many acres
will be scraped completely bare in the process, but
this is to be a "desert resort," right? So here is
the saddest part: after the sprinkler systems,
roads, foundations, golf courses and clubhouses
have been laid in, the developers will reconstitute
small islands of "natural" surroundings by
bringing in and planting what you see in
Exhibit C, below.
Deserts
R us
That this sucks is a matter of gospel
with me and I hope for you also. You will note that
the items in the picture are the "pretty" flora.
Whatever desert is recreated for the benefit of
golfers and heat-loving condo dwellers will be
purified, of course, and no one will have to risk
an ankle full of thorns to hit one back out of the
rough. (More's the pity, because the local terrain
easily lends itself to "extreme" varities of any
sort of sport you could name.)
Where there once was a thriving interrelated
desert community of living things, there will now
be a homogeneous order, a corporate-designed way of
life, no doubt much more vulnerable to the vagaries
of nature than that which preceded it. Hmmm. At
this point my vague allegory begins to fizzle out,
but there you have it. Still, I think there is
relevance here, and at least I got to wax sardonic
and talk about neutron bombs -- for those of you
who may be wondering why such things were not
employed in the Persian Gulf war, I have three
words for you: fuel-air explosives,* our
current more politically-correct alternative. Lots
messier, but radiation is so 60's, you
know?
Arachnids
to the rescue?
My mother lives in a longstanding mobile
home development for retired people. Over the years
virtually every lot has been sold, and the winding
streets are packed solidly with aluminum boxes
bearing signs like "Caution: Granddad and small
boys at play" or "I never promised you a rose
garden." [Seriously!] It is all in all a
fairly pleasant place, aside from too many ceramic
Mexican peasants taking siestas and yowling coyote
silhouettes. It is also almost completely deserted
during the summer months. The fact that I am here
and they are not will someday lead me to more
charitably evaluate the intelligence quotient of my
elders, but for now I walk the streets at night and
wonder.
Last night my wife and I were strolling through
an empty neighborhood when all at once she asked,
"Is that a tarantula?" and by God it was,
the biggest one I have ever seen, ambling slowly
across the still-hot pavement. They live here,
after all, as do plenty of scorpions and other
relatives.
"Leave it alone and it won't hurt you," I said,
but I sure wasn't about to pick it up and put it in
my pocket. Wouldn't have fit (!) anyway, and I'm
sure a bite would have been painful. But I was
heartened to see it there in the middle of the
road, calmly heading for some nice old lady's
carport, no doubt. No matter how much we rip,
replace, and remake, the "bugs" are still here, and
I love it! (Oh. So THIS is the end of the allegory,
after all.)
Bye now!
("Grack!")
Senior Applelinks editor and columnist John
H. Farr pledges that no software has been
harmed in the production of this column, all his
Microsoft apps having long ago been zeroed out.
* Not the exact jargon, but it will do.
* * * * * * * * *
Protect
Against MS "Smart Tags"!
Put this into the
<head> section of all your Web pages and
preserve the editorial integrity of your site.
(GRACK! is already smart tag free.) And if you
think that dog is just sleeping, think
again.
<meta
name="MSSmartTagsPreventParsing"
content="TRUE">
* * * * * * * *
*
GRACK Update
List
The new GRACK! Update mailing list is now
operational. To receive your own weekly notice of
new column postings, just CLICK
HERE and send a blank email.
Built
for Pleasure,
Not for Speed
AUDIO CREDIT: embedded
44k file, European
Birds -- Sounds and
Sonograms.
DESIGN
CREDIT: GRACK! byline graphic by Bob
Farr.
"GRACK!" is © copyright 2001, John H.
Farr, all rights reserved
|