|
Internet Explorer 5 - First Impressions
Wednesday, March 29, 2000
By Applelinks Contributing Editor Charles W. Moore
Following up my query yesterday about downloading Internet Explorer 4.5 with iCab, thanks to several readers who wrote affirming that they accomplished this with no trouble. I suspect that Microsoft's fast ftp server and my bog-slow rural dialup connection may have had a difference of opinion, so to speak, although I rarely have any difficulty with downloading software other than slowness. iCab's Download manager has proved very reliable over dozens of downloads.
Anyway, I did manage to get a copy of IE 5 down last night off this CNET URL:
ftp://ftp.download.com/pub/mac/internet/ie5en.bin, using IE 4.5. Took 50 minutes. Reader Chris Long says he brought it down with iCab over a T1 line, and "that download time was about one minute." Sigh.
My initial impressions of Internet Explorer 5?
It's fast! -- probably correct in claiming to be the fastest Mac browser yet
Bloat-creep has returned. After paring IE 4.5 down to a relatively svelte 3 MB (application) and 8.4 MB (including add-ons), IE 5 has ballooned again to 4.9 MB (application) and 10.4 MB (including add-ons) none of those figures includes the shared library and font junk dumped in the System Folder.
Memory demand remains the same at 4096k (with VM or RAM Doubler activated)
The new, "Aqua-themed" interface underwhelms me, and does nothing to convince me that I'm not going to get really tired of Aqua's loud color scheme PDQ. I really liked the old IE 4.5 interface, which I considered the most attractive of any browser, and I shall miss it. The big Aqua icons in IE 5 don't do anything for me, and the oversized "@" symbols scattered about everywhere are already tiresome.
Installation was a breeze, and IE 4.5 assimilated my IE 4.5 preferences smoothly.
I was able to drag my Hotlist.html file from iCab into IE 5's Preferences Folder after renaming it "Favorites.html" without a hitch.
I used IE 4.5 to order a piece of hardware from a secure Website, and it performed flawlessly.
I did not find IE 5's larger text rendering annoying, even on my PowerBook's 800 x 600 display.
Conclusion: After giving IE 5 a good workout, I shall probably return to my motif of using iCab as my main browser. The speed difference is not all that dramatic, at least on my crummy dialup connection, and I much prefer iCab's much more subdued and tasteful interface. I also am partial to the Germanic precision with which iCab works, and the philosophy of efficient coding that underlies it. (iCab is small -- 3 MB, and demands just 1400k of memory).
However, because iCab still doesn't have Javascript implementation quite ready for prime time, and is not 128 bit encrypted, I still need one of the behemoth browsers for some tasks, and my choice will now be IE 5 rather than Netscape 4.7.1 -- at least until Netscape 6 ships next month.
Charles W. Moore
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
|